fu-uck…
wow, i just looked at my ‘updates’ page and i scrolled down, and down,
and down,
and down,
and
down
and
do
wn
a
nd
do
w
n.
and boy oh boy have i written a lot of updates in the last year. i’m not tooting my own horn, but i have to say that i was kind of shocked to see just how many updates there are.
and i went to some other bands web sites and for the most part i wasn’t too impressed.
lots of bands have fancy and slick websites, but they all kind of look the same and they all take forever to load (well, for pathetic folk such as myself who have 26k connections).
my website might be simple and un-fancy, but i like it. my website philosophy has always been to focus on content and ease of use. i would love to have a quick and snazzy web site with lots of moving pictures and audio, but not until everyone (like me, stuck in the dark ages) has super-fast modem connections.
and, no offense to any web designers among you, but have you noticed that a lot of band sites really do kind of look the same? some of them are obviously really cool and distinctive, but a lot of them are quite homogenous.
and i’m sure that any web-designers reading this are the ones who designed the cool and distinctive sites, and it’s that shady guy/gal across the hall from you who designed the crappy, generic sites that i’ve been looking at.
but i’ve never designed a web-site, so far be it from me to pass comment (even though a lot of them are homogenous).
and how did the yankees lose 15-2?
is that even possible?
the world is all topsy-turvy.
moby